Key words: teacher development in EFL
in the Asian context, the classroom is like
a microcosm,
Abstract
This
paper investigates teacher development in
EFL in the Asian context, specifically referring
to the Thai and Japanese contexts at the tertiary
level. It argues that teacher development
for native speaker teachers of English would
benefit from gaining local knowledge of the
norms of classroom behavior and a background
to the history of EFL in that country. This
goes beyond finding appropriate methodologies
for the local context, taking the learning
process into the spheres of sociology, economics,
politics and religion. As examples of such
teacher development, it proposes a teacher
development (TD) model for the Thai setting
which explores the relationships between the
classroom, society and religion. It also puts
forward a similar, tabulated model for TD
in Japan in which the history of EFL is traced
to various social and political events. The
paper concludes that there is a need for foreign
lecturers to raise their awareness of influences
upon the learner and the educational system
in which the classroom is framed, and that
this process needs to consider local, non-Anglo-centric
concepts to enhance teacher development.
1.
Introduction
This paper considers teacher development in
tertiary EFL settings in Thailand and Japan.
Whilst Thailand is often stereotypically considered
to be less developed educationally and economically
than the west, it is argued that teacher development
(TD) into learner behaviour and attitudes
towards English language study are essential
for the expatriate teaching community to be
effective teachers in the Thai context. A
model for such TD linking classroom behaviour
and attitudes is proposed to bridge the gap
between western-learned educational knowledge
and the local Thai classroom. This is an example,
in essence, of the less 'developed' Thai cultural
context being used as an important means to
develop teachers from so-called more 'developed'
countries.
The paper then turns to another Asian setting,
that of Japan, clearly viewed as an advanced,
more developed country both economically and
educationally. Without taking a comparative
stance between Thailand and Japan, another
TD model is put forward, one which is intended
as providing the means to discuss the historical
links between the history of EFL and social,
economic and political events potentially
influencing the trends in English language
education in Japan. Finally, the conclusions
attempt to synthesize the rationale for taking
such a stance towards TD of native speaker
teachers of English in these two diverse settings.
2.
Teacher development in the Thai context
Looking firstly at the Thai context, I approach
the TD of native speaker teachers of English
working in the country by proposing an interactive
model of tables which embrace educational,
social and religious characteristics. The
main religion of Thailand, Theravada Buddhism,
can be seen as a belief system playing an
important role in influencing everyday Thai
social behavior and values. It is then natural
to presuppose that the wider social and religious
context around an educational establishment
somehow permeates the fabric of its schools,
colleges and universities. From this perspective,
the classroom is like a microcosm or "sub-system
of the country to which it belongs",
reflecting its values, religious beliefs and
economic realities (Buripakdi and Mahakhan,
1980, p. 259). This porous nature to classroom
walls may or may not be conscious to every
Thai in terms of what particular aspects of
Theravada Buddhism influence their social
and learning behavior, however, it is essential
for expatriate teaching staff to themselves
become aware that the learning environment
cannot be isolated from all those potential
influences. This awareness-raising among teachers
is essential in enabling them to overcome
cultural misunderstandings and gain a deeper
understanding of Thai attitudes to the learning
process (Brown, 2004; Adamson, 2003). Unfortunately,
TD in the Thai context rarely entails such
indirect study, concentrating rather on methodological
and linguistic advancement. This is not to
downplay the importance of such forms of TD.
Indeed finding appropriate methodologies to
suit local needs (Holliday, 1994) is an emerging
and valuable conceptual force in the region.
So what typifies the Thai learner to inform
a TD program what needs to be learned? Literature
on the nature of Thai students in classroom
situations often refers to the previously
explained concept of "krengjai"
(Holmes and Tangtongtavy, 1995) whereby Thais
are reluctant to express direct feedback to
their seniors. Consequently, a Thai student
may not be willing to ask questions directly
to the teacher in the classroom for fear of
challenging face and causing offence. Ballard
(1996) too states that a mirroring of traditional
Buddhist values of deference to authority
figures can occur in classroom settings. Another
concept acting as a potential explanation
for confusion is that of "sam ru am"
(Holmes and Tangtongtavy, 1995, p. 56) which
in Thai Buddhism emphasises the ability to
show restraint and composure in stressful
situations. This may create the impression
of passiveness in classroom discussions. As
Buripakdi and Mahakhan (1980, p.269) remind
us, there is seemingly a lack of "critical
questioning" in the Thai educational
system leading foreigners to conclude that
the Thai student is unable to think critically,
can only be "reproductive" (Ballard
1996) in learning and is, therefore, unprepared
for the western lecturers' demands for critical
thinking. Biggs (1994) summarises this mismatch
of teaching and learning strategies and styles
by warning of the wholesale import of western
methodologies and assumptions about learner
beliefs and attitudes into Asian settings.
In light of these difficulties, TD is necessary
to, at least, inform the foreign lecturer
of forthcoming silences and possible discontent
among students. To counter this, research
into Thai learner strategies and attitudes
(Adamson, 2004; 2003) proposes workshops among
the expatriate teachers and Thai administrative
staff with a series of tables utilising three
foci: common classroom behaviour and attitudes,
social behaviour, and aspects of Theravada
Buddhism. Of some importance in this collection
of themes is the use of some key Thai expressions,
perhaps difficult at first for non-Thai speakers.
The rationale for this is that interpretations
of Thai behaviour should, if possible, be
made with reference to Thai cultural terms
themselves (Mulder, 1996). This concurs with
Wierzbicka's (1991) rejection of "monolingual
universals or static global comparisons".
Generic terms such as "shyness"
or "reticence" are a vague means
to use in assessments and are defined by the
assessor according to their own socio-cultural
norms. Table 1 illustrates these foci in no
particular order or ranking. The criteria
are taken from readings in the three fields
(Mulder, 1996; Morris, 1994; Marek, 1994;
Davidson, 1992; Cush, 1993; Holmes and Tangtongtavy,
1995). The choice is admittedly subjective
and there may be more potential influences
upon classroom behaviour. The renegotiation
of such items, though, would form the basis
of healthy discussion among teachers and administrative
staff and could easily be added.
Table
1: Three aspects of religion, social behaviour
and learner behaviour
|
Theravada
Buddhist aspects
|
Thai
social
behavioural aspects
|
Thai
learners'
behavioural aspects
|
|
Karma
|
Success/failure,
|
Goal-oriented
|
|
|
ambition
& motivation
|
Novelty
|
|
The
Self
|
sanuk
|
Face
|
|
Compassion
|
sabaaj
|
Large
group classes
|
|
Detachment
|
Individualism
|
Plagiarism
|
|
Wisdom
|
The
Group
|
Book-oriented
|
|
Self-reliance
|
Pragmatism/utilitarianism
|
Rote-learning
|
|
Respect
for
|
Thinking
|
Lack
of critical analysis
|
|
monkhood
|
Authority
|
Teacher-dependent
|
|
|
Responsibility
|
Teachers'
pastoral care
|
The
objective is to discuss how inter-connected
these three foci are, how they inter-play
with each other. There is no set answer as
the outcome is the process of discussion itself.
Firstly, it is proposed that the TD participants
focus on the aspects of Theravada Buddhism
and then attempt to trace, connect, and relate
to their influences on social behaviour and
then, in turn, learner behaviour. An example
of this is shown in Table 2 from workshops
conducted in a Thai college:
Table
2: Potential influences from Theravada Buddhism
to learner behaviour
|
Theravada
Buddhism aspects
|
Thai
social behavioural aspects
|
Thai
learners' behavioural aspects
|
|
Karma
|
Success/failure,
ambition & motivation
|
Goal-oriented
|
|
|
sanuk
|
novelty
|
|
|
sabaaj
|
large
group classes, lack of critical analysis
|
|
|
Pragmatism/utilitarianism
|
Goal-oriented,
lack of critical analysis
|
|
|
Authority
|
Book-oriented,
rote-learning, teacher-dependent &
teachers' pastoral care
|
As
can be seen, karma was thought to be related
to various social factors from people's attitudes
towards success and failure, ambition and
motivation. These were then inter-linked with
goal-orientation in the classroom. By simply
asking participants to conceive of a relationship
between Buddhist traits and classroom behaviour,
the exercise becomes too difficult. This is
where the intermediary stage of social aspects
of behaviour plays an important role for participants
since it appears to provide a bridge between
the classroom and Buddhism, acting perhaps
as a conduit.
The next stage in the TD process is to reverse
the analysis by taking learner behaviour as
the focus and then trying to retrace it back
through social to Buddhist aspects. This is
done to remind the participants of the primary
objective of the exercise, that is, to explain
and explore the reasons for classroom-based
misunderstandings, not just to say with discrimination
'it's because they are lazy', or 'they just
don't know how to study' which were common
complaints among expatriate staff in my experience.
Table 3 illustrates this process with the
focus on a lack of critical analysis.
Table
3: Potential influences for learner behaviour
from Theravada Buddhism
| Thai
learners' behavioural aspects |
Thai
social behavioural aspects |
Theravada
Buddhism aspects |
|
|
|
| Lack
of critical analysis |
sabaaj,
pragmatism/utilitarianism and thinking |
Karma,
detachment, compassion and wisdom |
The
exercise itself, though, perhaps has the weakness
of not being able to define the relative degree
in which Buddhism or a social characteristic
is related to learner behaviour, since, as
can be seen in Tables 2 and 3, there may be
connections with a variety of aspects. Again,
this may form the basis of extra discussion,
which is in itself a form of TD. As Buddhist
teachings themselves call for verification
among religious students (Marek, 1994, and
Gurugé, 1977), in the same way, these
tables need to be probed, doubted and perhaps
even agreed with. They are fundamentally formed
by the workshop participants themselves and
the resultant discussion in that process is
a cathartic one which challenges teachers
to explain, in some cases, their prejudice
towards Thai students.
What has been described in this section is
a proposal for TD in the Thai context. It
is a negotiated transfer of local knowledge
and serves as an example of what is missing
in teacher preparation programmes for EFL
teachers coming to Thailand, or even those
who have already been present in the country
for years working with frustration and even
discrimination towards their students. It
is not expected that every Certificate, Diploma
or Master training programme in EFL include
this, yet it does show clearly the need for
the concept of "front-loading" (Freeman,
2002) to be recognised as a common cultural
limitation on teacher preparation programmes.
It is a proposal for deeper reflection about
local context (Brown, 2004) which TD in the
Thai context needs to integrate in some manner
in the development of expatriate staff.
3.
Teacher development in the Japanese context
I turn now to a different Asian context, that
of Japan, in a similar educational setting,
that of college-level EFL. Instead of comparing
the Thai and Japanese situation regarding
TD for native speakers teachers of English,
I would like to focus on another possible
TD model which can be used for EFL teachers.
Much can still be said about the necessity
for expatriate teaching staff to adapt their
methodologies to local student needs and,
like the Thai TD model proposed, for them
to understand the wider social context which
influences classroom behaviour. The Thai example
of teachers from the 'developed' west learning
from their 'less developed' Thai counterparts
is an appealing concept, a re-examination
of what constitutes appropriate educational
knowledge.
The Japanese case is perhaps more complex,
however, since religion appears to play a
less overt influence on daily behavioral norms.
Sensitizing foreign teachers to local educational
norms in the more 'developed' Japanese case
requires a slightly different perspective
of what criteria to use in tabulated form.
For this purpose, Fujimoto-Adamson (2005),
in an adaptation of work by Imura (2003),
proposes models which require teachers, both
foreign and perhaps even together with local
staff (as in the Thai models), to examine
and discuss the influence of social, political
and economic events upon EFL history in Japan.
These events are both national and international
in nature and, again as in the Thai TD proposal,
some concepts are in Japanese. An example
of an adapted model can be seen in Table 4
below:
Table
4. The First Stage of English Education in
the Showa Era (Imura, 2003: 289, translated
and adapted by Fujimoto-Adamson)
| Year |
Events
related to English Education |
Social,
political and economic events |
| 1926 |
Starting
of 'Primary English Program' by Kataoka
on radio |
Rise
of the military right wing and nihonjinron
theory |
| 1927 |
Fujimura,
'Urgent, abolition of English Education' |
The
Manchurian |
| 1931 |
|
Incident
and assassination of the Japanese P.M. |
| 1933 |
First
reduction of English lessons at schools |
|
| 1936 |
|
Withdrawal
from |
| 1937 |
Palmer
went back to U.K. |
the
League of |
| 1938 |
|
Nations |
| 1940 |
Fujimura,
'Abolition of English Lessons in Junior
High Schools' |
Alignment
with
the Axis
|
| 1941 |
English
words start to disappear from baseball
(yakyu). |
Japanese
dress only encouraged |
| 1942 |
Dismissal
of U.K. and U.S. lecturers in all Japanese
universities |
The
Pacific
War
|
Other
tables have been formulated for eras from
the opening up of Japan in the nineteenth
century to the present day. It is proposed
that each era, based on the rule of an Emperor,
is used as a separate TD session since discussions
can become quite extensive. Viewing Table
4, this important period in time shows the
decline in popularity of English from the
late 1920s to the start of the Pacific War
in 1942 and aligns it with the growth of military-led
fascism. In many cases, the educational event
may be directly correlated with political
movements on the right. There are also social
trends, for example, the encouragement of
Japanese dress only for men and women which
mirrored the increasing anti-western stance
propagated by the right-wing governments of
the late 1930s. Interestingly, in terms of
EFL educational trends taking place, English
words were increasingly removed from schools,
textbooks, and even baseball terminology.
Historical perspectives appear to have some
degree of influence over the various trends
of English popularity and changes in government
policies towards EFL. Again, as in the Thai
models, this lack of degree of influence is
not defined. Despite this shortcoming in the
models, the basic fact remains that awareness
of the interplay between educational events
and the wider social, economic and political
fields is limited among foreign EFL teachers
in Japan. This often leads to misconceptions
about why trends are taking place or government
policies made. Such misconceptions need a
historical perspective to enlighten the teacher,
to make them see how English has experienced
a number of booms and subsequent political
and philosophically-fuelled backlashes. For
the EFL teacher at the tertiary level, awareness
of such issues translates into an understanding
of why recruitment is becoming more difficult,
why the curriculum is gradually changed methodologically
and, in turn, why students in classrooms themselves
have varying degrees of motivation towards
English over time.
As an example of this inter-play which is
not fully understood by teachers recently
arrived to my own teaching context, the 1998
Winter Olympics which took place in the same
prefecture ignited an English boom in both
the private and public sectors, yet was followed
by financial difficulties resulting from overspending
on that event. Such economic factors then
induced a tightening of local government funding
into education, and consequently a reduction
in college budgets previously used to finance
the recruitment of English staff and resources.
Similar to the Thai case, the classroom needs
to be viewed as a microcosm of the society
around it, whether the teacher is conducive
to such indirect perspectives on EFL or not.
TD focusing on issues as far away from English
teaching as politics, sports and philosophical
trends, as in the pre-war nihonjinron movement
stipulating the uniqueness of the Japanese
(Buruma, 2003), can fill the awareness gap.
4.
Conclusions
This paper has taken the stance that transfer
of knowledge from the local context to foreign
EFL teachers is an essential part of their
long-term TD. The Thai context necessitates
the supplementation to TD programs at the
tertiary level of religious and social influences
upon learner behaviour, whilst TD in the Japanese
context requires economic, social and political
(perhaps even philosophical) perspectives
to be related to EFL educational trends and
policies. Both, I believe, are, in the first
instance, examples of how TD in the Asian
context should go beyond methodological awareness-raising.
In the second instance, they serve as valuable
reminders of how foreign English language
teachers can learn from both less developed
and relatively more developed educational
contexts. Perhaps the point here is that TD
is an issue not directly related to whether
the local context is an economically less
or more developed one, but that the teacher
is conducive to taking part in development
sessions which are a step beyond those intended
as appropriating their array of methodologies
to the local setting. There must exist a willingness
to think and debate issues which are perhaps
beyond their original training in linguistics.
As Ferguson and Donno (2003) indicate, western-based
ELT training programs require the strengthening
of the post-qualification foreign appointment
by a bridge between their recently acquired
methodological knowledge and awareness of
the local context in which they are to apply
this knowledge. It is exactly for that purpose
that these exploratory models of TD have been
devised.
5.
References
Adamson, J. L. (2003). Challenging beliefs
in teacher development: Potential influences
of Theravada Buddhism upon Thais learning
English. Asian EFL Journal, 3(3).Retrieved
19th October, 2005 from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/sept_03_sub_hm.htm
Adamson, J. L. (2004). Investigating college
student attitudes towards learning English
and their learning strategies: Insights from
interviews in Thailand. Journal of Asia
TEFL, 1(2), 47-70.
Ballard, B. (1996). Through language to learning:
Preparing overseas students for study in Western
universities. In H. Coleman, (Ed.) Society
and the language classroom (pp. 148-168)
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biggs, J. (1994). What are effective schools?
Lessons from East and West. Australian
Educational Researcher, 21(1), 19-59.
Brown, D. (2004). A Consideration of the role
of the four Iddhipada and the Sutta in teaching
English in Thailand today. Asian EFL Journal,
6(4). Retrieved 19th October, 2005 from
http//www.asian-efl-journal.com/december_04_D.B.html
Buripakdi, C. and Mahakhan, P. (1980). Thailand.
In T. N. Postlethwaite, and R. M.Thomas (Eds.),
Schooling in the ASEAN region (pp.
223-272) London: Pergamon Press.
Buruma, I. (2003). Inventing Japan.
New York: Modern Library Chronicles.
Cush, D. (1993). Buddhism. London:
Hodder and Stoughton.
Davidson, B.W. (1988). A case for critical
thinking in the English language classroom
TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 119-123.
Ferguson, G. and Donno, S. (2003). One-month
teacher training courses: Time for a change?
ELT Journal, Vol. 57, Number 1, pp.
26 - 33.
Freeman, D. (2002). The hidden side of the
work: teacher knowledge and learning to teach.
Language teaching, 35, 1-13.
Fujimoto-Adamson, N. (2005 in writing). Unpublished
dissertation on Japanese team-teaching. Leicester
University Ed.D. Program.
Gurugé, A. (1977). Buddhism and
education. New Delhi: Mahabodhi Society
of India.
Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology
and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Holmes, H. and Tangtongtavy, S. (1995). Working
with the Thais. Bangkok: White Lotus.
Imura, M. (2003). Nihon no Eigokyoiku 200
nen. Tokyo: Taishukanshoten.
Marek, J.C. (1994). Buddhist theory of human
nature and development. In T. Husen and T.
N. Postlethwaite (Eds.) The International
Encyclopedia of Education Vol. 1, pp.
577-581, Oxford: Pergamon.
Morris, B. (1994). Anthropology of the
self. London: Pluto Press.
Mulder, N. (1996). Inside Thai society.
Amsterdam: Pepin Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1994). Cross-Cultural pragmatics.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.